<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Backup Brain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.backupbrain.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.backupbrain.com</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:57:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Help me pick a new paperless office organizer by Tom Negrino</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2011/05/help-me-pick-a-new-paperless-office-organizer/#comment-5749</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/?p=4450#comment-5749</guid>
		<description>I ended up going with Evernote Premium. DevonThink was just too much of a time investment. I created some TextExpander snippets to make renaming the scanned files from the ScanSnap a bit easier. 

And I decided not to be concerned about the notebooks in the cloud issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ended up going with Evernote Premium. DevonThink was just too much of a time investment. I created some TextExpander snippets to make renaming the scanned files from the ScanSnap a bit easier. </p>
<p>And I decided not to be concerned about the notebooks in the cloud issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Help me pick a new paperless office organizer by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2011/05/help-me-pick-a-new-paperless-office-organizer/#comment-5746</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/?p=4450#comment-5746</guid>
		<description>Yes, I have the same question! And coincidentally, not too long after you asked it.

Yep has another &quot;upgrade&quot; forcing a full price via App Store so I&#039;m seriously looking at Evernote. 

I had an old license of DEVONThink 2 kicking around from a MacUpdate promo so I tried it out. I found it quite lacking in the visual dept relative to Yep and Evernote. Also, it kept crashing and had around 10,000 orphaned notes for some reason so I trashed it.

Ultimately though, DT is just too complex for something that should be easy.

I have the same privacy concerns, but I like the idea of the non-syncing notebook in Evernote. One thing that DT has over this is that you can run a server and access your files from your mobile device. This involves some complexity of course though. :)

The only downsides I can see to Evernote would be subscription-based cost (adds up to quite a big price difference eventually between the other products) and lack of support for OpenMeta tags (and no conversion route that I&#039;m aware of). However, as mentioned above, the search feature is strong enough to get lazy about tagging or lose existing tags in the conversion and not really notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I have the same question! And coincidentally, not too long after you asked it.</p>
<p>Yep has another &#8220;upgrade&#8221; forcing a full price via App Store so I&#8217;m seriously looking at Evernote. </p>
<p>I had an old license of DEVONThink 2 kicking around from a MacUpdate promo so I tried it out. I found it quite lacking in the visual dept relative to Yep and Evernote. Also, it kept crashing and had around 10,000 orphaned notes for some reason so I trashed it.</p>
<p>Ultimately though, DT is just too complex for something that should be easy.</p>
<p>I have the same privacy concerns, but I like the idea of the non-syncing notebook in Evernote. One thing that DT has over this is that you can run a server and access your files from your mobile device. This involves some complexity of course though. <img src='http://www.backupbrain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The only downsides I can see to Evernote would be subscription-based cost (adds up to quite a big price difference eventually between the other products) and lack of support for OpenMeta tags (and no conversion route that I&#8217;m aware of). However, as mentioned above, the search feature is strong enough to get lazy about tagging or lose existing tags in the conversion and not really notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Help me pick a new paperless office organizer by Stephan</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2011/05/help-me-pick-a-new-paperless-office-organizer/#comment-5744</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/?p=4450#comment-5744</guid>
		<description>Tom,

So what did you finally decide?  And how is it working for you?

Seems to come down to a choice between Evernote and DevonThink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>So what did you finally decide?  And how is it working for you?</p>
<p>Seems to come down to a choice between Evernote and DevonThink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dori&#8217;s Grand Unified Theory of Women, Girls, Chicks, and Babes by Denise</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5741</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/18/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5741</guid>
		<description>I second that congrats. And I LOVE the comment at the end of the article: &quot;Those with a product sell it at the show. Those without one plug what is coming. The remainder hire models.&quot; Ouch! You go...uh...girl.   ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that congrats. And I LOVE the comment at the end of the article: &#8220;Those with a product sell it at the show. Those without one plug what is coming. The remainder hire models.&#8221; Ouch! You go&#8230;uh&#8230;girl.   <img src='http://www.backupbrain.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dori&#8217;s Grand Unified Theory of Women, Girls, Chicks, and Babes by SIMON P</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5738</link>
		<dc:creator>SIMON P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/18/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5738</guid>
		<description>How can you be so rude?

Women are to be called by their proper names and not categorized! If you find them attractive, intelligent, charming, feels all right for me but chicks, babes?

You would be surprised to hear the comments they make about men.
when they find them boring, macho, self-centered,  but, it happens, they also find us interesting, cute, strong and protective, idiotic but elegant, etc...

But I haven&#039;t heard them using slang words for men, have you?

Bulls, pigs, worms, what would you expect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you be so rude?</p>
<p>Women are to be called by their proper names and not categorized! If you find them attractive, intelligent, charming, feels all right for me but chicks, babes?</p>
<p>You would be surprised to hear the comments they make about men.<br />
when they find them boring, macho, self-centered,  but, it happens, they also find us interesting, cute, strong and protective, idiotic but elegant, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>But I haven&#8217;t heard them using slang words for men, have you?</p>
<p>Bulls, pigs, worms, what would you expect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dori&#8217;s Grand Unified Theory of Women, Girls, Chicks, and Babes by Souvik Ghosh Dastidar</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5736</link>
		<dc:creator>Souvik Ghosh Dastidar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/18/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5736</guid>
		<description>Good analysis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dori&#8217;s Grand Unified Theory of Women, Girls, Chicks, and Babes by Anton Sherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5734</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Sherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/18/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5734</guid>
		<description>Congrats on getting cited in the Econ!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on getting cited in the Econ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dori&#8217;s Grand Unified Theory of Women, Girls, Chicks, and Babes by Rod Dalitz</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5733</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Dalitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/2008/07/18/doris-grand-unified-theory-of-women-girls-chicks-and-babes/#comment-5733</guid>
		<description>So is THAT why the answer to the universe and all that, is 42?  Sounds plausible ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is THAT why the answer to the universe and all that, is 42?  Sounds plausible &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attack of the Return of the Kindle Plunging by Tom Negrino</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2012/01/attack-of-the-return-of-the-kindle-plunging/#comment-5732</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/?p=4492#comment-5732</guid>
		<description>No, as I haven&#039;t used the base model Kindle. I don&#039;t like the navigation pad, as I occasionally add notes. The Kindle Touch has an on-screen keyboard, and the base model uses the move-to-next-letter-and-click method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, as I haven&#8217;t used the base model Kindle. I don&#8217;t like the navigation pad, as I occasionally add notes. The Kindle Touch has an on-screen keyboard, and the base model uses the move-to-next-letter-and-click method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attack of the Return of the Kindle Plunging by Mark Geary</title>
		<link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2012/01/attack-of-the-return-of-the-kindle-plunging/#comment-5730</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Geary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupbrain.com/?p=4492#comment-5730</guid>
		<description>Are you able to comment on the Kindle Touch vs the base model Kindle (Kindle untouchable?)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you able to comment on the Kindle Touch vs the base model Kindle (Kindle untouchable?)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

